http://edition.cnn.com/2008/HEALTH/11/13/alcohol.tax.deaths/?imw=Y&iref=mpstoryemail
Summary
This recent CNN article reported on the reduction of deaths and diseases due to alchohol after excise taxes were implemented. Statistics show that when Alaska raised its alcohol tax in 1983,deaths caused by or related to alcohol dropped by 29 percent, quite a significant amount. In 2002 an 11 percent reduction was the result of another tax increase. It was clear that raising the tax saved lives because it results in some lower consumption of alcohol. The statistics used in the study were gathered by information from death certificates; Dr. Alexander Wagenaar, a professor at the University of Florida's Department of Epidemiology and Health Policy Research along with the co-authors compiled the number of deaths connected to alcohol such as alcohol poisoning and alcoholic liver disease, and diseases linked to alcohol, such as cirrhosis and chronic pancreatitis. Deaths caused by alcohol-related car accidents or violence were excluded in the study. It is also worth noting that researchers in Finland have found similiar results. When the government of Finland lowered the tax on alcohol in 2004 to protect domestic sales, the number of arrests on intoxicated individuals increased by 11 percent. Of course, the American alcohol industry opposes the excise taxes because they claim that they would only prevent the responsible consumers rather than the abusers of alcohol from purchasing products. Another argument that was made was that taxing alcohol would have negative imapct on the economy because of diminshing returns for the government.
Connections to Chapter 3
The component in this chapter was the role of the government in a market economy. In the situation above the government levied an excise tax on the alcohol industry in Alaska in order to curb alcohol use. The excise tax increases the price of alcohol which shifts the supply curve upwards. This also lowers the demand for the product by increasing the incidence tax depending on its elasticity. The question of whether alcohol is an inelastic or elastic good is dependant on whether the consumer is heavy drinker( making it inelastic) or one who enjoys wine or spirits and only drinks occasionally (which would make it elastic). The article seems to contradict the idea in the chapter that the imposition of an excise tax on alcohol (which according to the text is an inelastic product) will generate revenue for the government because of its inelasticity.This however is not the case since the number deaths/diseases due to alcohol has declined and one can infer that this is the result of a decline in demand. Another connection to the chapterthat can be made would be positive third party effects. The less people consuming heavy amounts of alcohol, the less potential there is of an alcohol related death or accident among the population.
Personal Reflection
An excise tax can reduce alcohol consumption as shown in the study, but I believe that prevention programs and education are the best solutions to this constant problem in society. Taxes on alcohol cannot truly diminish the problems since it is considered an inelastic good along with tobacco. A higher tax on alcohol might also be needed to offset the inflation the economy is experiencing. I agree that a excise tax would affect the demand of those who drink responsibly but will not affect the heavy drinkers whom the government should focus on helping. Overall it is good to see that taxes on alcohol have had significant benefits in Alaska. A similiar policy should be replicated for other products that can to be harmful to the population and environment e.g: tobacco,automoblie air conditioners and carbon dioxide producing items.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
I think that the excise tax on alcohol is a great way to reduce the deaths caused by alcohol and also to reduce the demand for it as well. This might not help prevent the people who are heavy drinkers but it could reduce the amount of people who are becoming drinkers. I think that alcohol is really an inelastic good because even though there are many other substances out there that can produce an effect like drinking, there is no substance that makes the exact same feel. I think that the people who tend to drink a lot would not really mind the excise tax because they really care about getting that drink or two. The people who would be moved by the excise tax would probably be the young adults or perhaps the people who don’t have that much money.
C.Wong
Block F
I think by implementing the excise tax on alcohol, it is probably the best way to control deaths caused by alcohol. But unfortunately, if we look at the other side of the situation, then we are only knocking off the responsible drinker from drinking, and not focusing on the main culprit which is the heavy drinkers. I think implementing an excise tax would not prevent the heavy drinkers from quiting, because they are hooked on alcohol for good, but in the long run, the excise tax could have possibly saved many people from being alcoholics.
E.Leung
I think a raise on the excise tax is a good idea to prevent people from drinking or smoking too much which could lead to disastrous results. Even though it varies from people to people, I believe that with the excise tax, it’ll at least prevent some people from buying it. Sadly, the government has taken away the excise tax by lowering it every year by 2%. It took effect on March 1st of 2006 at 12:01 am till March 1st of 2009. The taxing rate would be reduced from 8% to 0% within these 3 years. Taking away the tax may boost up our economy, but in many ways, bad for the people.
Kathy Tang
I approve of what the Alaskan government had done to reduce alcohol sales. Agreeing with Jason's point, the tax would only affect the demand of those responsible consumers rather than the heavy drinkers. Alcohol, although optimal if taken in small quantities, is almost as addictive as drugs. I would really love to have the government of Vancouver implement a similar tax. This may reduce the amount of problems occurring in the Downtown Eastside, where many of the homeless people spend their money on drugs and alcohol rather than trying to re-establish themselves.
Jason Choy
Block F
I believe the action taken by the Alaskan government to reduce the death from the effects of alcohol is a good start but they shouldn’t stop there. Like you said, the tax will probably only affect the demand of those who drink responsibly but will not affect the heavy drinkers, then the next step should be creating programs to help heavy drinkers and advertisements to promote it. So in the end, the excise tax will probably stop people from being heavy drinkers and the advertisements and programs will help people from being heavy drinkers.
E.Li
Block F
Post a Comment